MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294188153

DM4VGI: A template with dynamic metadata for documenting and validating the quality of Volunteered Geographic Information

2013· article· en· W2294188153 on OpenAlexaff
Wagner Dias de Souza, Jugurta Lisboa Filho, Jarbas Nunes Vidal Filho, Jean H. S. Câmara

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Symposium on GeoInformatics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolunteered geographic informationMetadataInteroperabilityComputer scienceDocumentationWorld Wide WebGeospatial metadataGeographic information systemQuality (philosophy)Data qualityGeospatial analysisInformation retrievalData scienceMetadata repositoryGeographyMeta Data ServicesEngineeringCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) is a Web phenomenon known as user-generated� content , which involves resources from Web 2.0 and geographic data. Geobrowsers are websites that collect and provide VGI. These systems, however, do not follow norms or standards for data collection or documentation, which makes it difficult to recover such data and limits the interoperability among VGI systems. In addition, the quality of the data collected by VGI systems has often been questioned. This paper proposes the DM4VGI, a template for creating dynamic metadata from volunteered geographic information provided by users through Geobrowsers or Virtual Globes. The DM4VGI is used to document and validate the quality of the VGI, as well as to facilitate data interoperability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Symposium on GeoInformaticsSame topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207