MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294247296 · doi:10.33137/pbsc.v53i1.21417

The Fragmented Armada: The Transmission of an Armada News Pamphlet (pp 107-130)

2016· article· en· W2294247296 on OpenAlex
Meaghan J. Brown

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePapers of The Bibliographical Society of Canada · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsHistoryClassicsMedia studiesPolitical scienceLawSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

William Cecil’s Copie of a Letter (STC 15412 – 15414.6), consisting of a Letter, its postscript, its printer’s epistle and an additional pamphlet, Certaine Advertisements Ovt of Ireland, was produced in stages in the fall of 1588, an accumulative production attested to by both bibliographical evidence and governmental correspondence. The texts describe England’s military preparations, political climate, and the events of the summer in the form of an epistolary news letter addressed to Don Bernardino de Mendoza, the Spanish Ambassador to France. This attempt to spread the news of Spanish defeat, to delegitimize Catholic news sources, and to dissuade Catholic support for another convoy grew and developed as the political situation unfolded over the summer and early autumn of 1588. This paper examines the production and transmission of Cecil’s propaganda pamphlet to explore the interpretive frameworks that textual producers, both authors and publishers, used to package early modern news.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it