MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294341534 · doi:10.1145/2151171.2151177

Elimination graphs

2012· article· en· W2294341534 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Algorithms · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsChordal graphMathematicsSplit graphDiscrete mathematicsBlock graphIndifference graphIntersection graphPathwidthIndependent setLine graphGraph1-planar graph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we study graphs with inductive neighborhood properties. Let P be a graph property, a graph G = ( V, E ) with n vertices is said to have an inductive neighborhood property with respect to P if there is an ordering of vertices v 1 , …, v n such that the property P holds on the induced subgraph G [ N ( v i )∩ V i ], where N ( v i ) is the neighborhood of v i and V i = { v i , …, v n }. It turns out that if we take P as a graph with maximum independent set size no greater than k , then this definition gives a natural generalization of both chordal graphs and ( k + 1)-claw-free graphs. We refer to such graphs as inductive k -independent graphs. We study properties of such families of graphs, and we show that several natural classes of graphs are inductive k -independent for small k . In particular, any intersection graph of translates of a convex object in a two dimensional plane is an inductive 3 -independent graph; furthermore, any planar graph is an inductive 3 -independent graph. For any fixed constant k , we develop simple, polynomial time approximation algorithms for inductive k -independent graphs with respect to several well-studied NP-complete problems. Our generalized formulation unifies and extends several previously known results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it