MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294378931 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2015.2503277

Per-Node Traffic Load in Cooperative Wireless Sensor Networks

2015· article· en· W2294378931 on OpenAlexaff
Fatemeh Mansourkiaie, Mohamed H. Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceWireless sensor networkFadingKey distribution in wireless sensor networksSink (geography)Node (physics)Wireless networkCooperative diversityMultipath routingWirelessRouting protocolDistributed computingRouting (electronic design automation)Channel (broadcasting)Dynamic Source RoutingTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cooperative diversity has gained much interest due to its ability to mitigate multipath fading without using multiple antennas. In multihop wireless networks, such as wireless sensor networks, per-node traffic load helps to provide important insights into designing efficient network protocols. Cooperative diversity introduces new aspects to the per-node traffic load. In this letter, we present an analytical model for estimating the per-node traffic load in a cooperative wireless sensor network. We consider a typical scenario, wherein the sensor nodes sense the environment and forward the events to a sink node using the greedy geographical routing. Our results confirm that traffic load increases as a function of the nodes vicinity to the sink node. Simulation results validate the accuracy of our analytical model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207