MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Humanidades digitales: la censura y los laudatorios en las preliminares del Siglo de Oro español; Madrid y Guzmán de Alfarache

2016· article· es· W2294423840 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHallazgos · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiteracy and Educational Practices
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Este artículo presenta los resultados del estudio de la censura y los laudatorios en algunas preliminares de la literatura del Siglo de Oro español. Fue realizado con la metodología de “<em>queries</em>” en la plataforma Sylvadb del Laboratorio Culturplex. El trabajo se divide en cuatro partes: introducción, donde se definen los elementos teóricos desde los cuales se aborda la investigación; metodología, en la que se tratan los pasos de la investigación desde la lectura, la elaboración de la base de datos, las consultas (<em>searchs</em>) y preguntas (<em>queries</em>); resultados, en los cuales se indican los resultados obtenidos de la investigación, y por último están las conclusiones, que señalan dos asuntos que aportan nuevas propuestas al campo de los estudios literarios respecto a las humanidades digitales y al trabajo sobre las preliminares.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it