Extension and validation of the GLYCAM force field parameters for modeling glycosaminoglycans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are an important class of carbohydrates that serve critical roles in blood clotting, tissue repair, cell migration and adhesion, and lubrication. The variable sulfation pattern and iduronate ring conformations in GAGs influence their polymeric structure and nature of interaction. This study characterizes several heparin-like GAG disaccharides and tetrasaccharides using NMR and molecular dynamics simulations to assist in the development of parameters for GAGs within the GLYCAM06 force field. The force field additions include parameters and charges for a transferable sulfate group for O- and N-sulfation, neutral (COOH) forms of iduronic and glucuronic acid, and Δ4,5-unsaturated uronate (ΔUA) residues. ΔUA residues frequently arise from the enzymatic digestion of heparin and heparin sulfate. Simulations of disaccharides containing ΔUA reveal that the presence of sulfation on this residue alters the relative populations of 1 H 2 and 2 H 1 ring conformations. Simulations of heparin tetrasaccharides containing N-sulfation in place of N-acetylation on glucosamine residues influence the ring conformations of adjacent iduronate residues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".