MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294622949 · doi:10.1109/tit.2017.2688381

Exponential Decay of Reconstruction Error From Binary Measurements of Sparse Signals

2017· article· en· W2294622949 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersArmy Research OfficeSimons FoundationAmerican Institute of MathematicsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsQuantization (signal processing)OversamplingAlgorithmCompressed sensingThresholdingBinary numberComputer scienceNormalization (sociology)Signal reconstructionExponential functionMathematicsSignal processingArtificial intelligenceBandwidth (computing)Digital signal processingArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Binary measurements arise naturally in a variety of statistics and engineering applications. They may be inherent to the problem-for example, in determining the relationship between genetics and the presence or absence of a disease-or they may be a result of extreme quantization. A recent influx of literature has suggested that using prior signal information can greatly improve the ability to reconstruct a signal from binary measurements. This is exemplified by one-bit compressed sensing, which takes the compressed sensing model but assumes that only the sign of each measurement is retained. It has recently been shown that the number of one-bit measurements required for signal estimation mirrors that of unquantized compressed sensing. Indeed, s-sparse signals in Rn can be estimated (up to normalization) from Ω(slog (n/s)) one-bit measurements. Nevertheless, controlling the precise accuracy of the error estimate remains an open challenge. In this paper, we focus on optimizing the decay of the error as a function of the oversampling factor λ := m/(s log(n/s)), where m is the number of measurements. It is known that the error in reconstructing sparse signals from standard one-bit measurements is bounded below by Ω(λ-1). Without adjusting the measurement procedure, reducing this polynomial error decay rate is impossible. However, we show that an adaptive choice of the thresholds used for quantization can lower the error rate to e-Ω(λ). This improves upon guarantees for other methods of adaptive thresholding, such as sigma- delta quantization. We develop a general recursive strategy to achieve this exponential decay and two specific polynomial-time algorithms, which fall into this framework, one based on convex programming and one on hard thresholding. Our work bridges the one-bit compressed sensing model, in which the engineer controls the measurement procedure, to sigma-delta and successive approximation quantization. Moreover, the principle is extendable to signal reconstruction problems in a variety of binary statistical models as well as statistical estimation problems like logistic regression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it