MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294653518 · doi:10.1111/ijd.13262

Disseminated anetoderma in a patient with nodal Epstein–Barr virus‐associated classical Hodgkin lymphoma: Anetodermic form of a concurrent discordant cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma

2016· article· en· W2294653518 on OpenAlexaff
Anupam Varshney, Tarang Goyal, Vijay Zawar, Marianne Tinguely, Werner Kempf

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Dermatology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDermatological and Skeletal Disorders
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLymphomaMarginal zonePathologyNODALEpstein–Barr virusMarginal zone B-cell lymphomaLymphoproliferative disordersVirusImmunologyB cellInternal medicineAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with a lymphoma have an increased risk of developing a second lymphoproliferative disorder. The association of nodal Hodgkin lymphoma and primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma (MALT type) is exceptional, and only very few cases have been documented. Anetoderma represents a circumscribed loss or rarefication of elastic fibers. Different underlying processes may result in anetoderma, including cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma. We report a 50-year-old male patient with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated nodal Hodgkin lymphoma who presented with disseminated anetodermic skin lesions. Biopsies of the skin lesions revealed a B-cell infiltrate containing monoclonal plasma cells but without detection of EBV. The skin lesions represent an anetodermic form of primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma. It is the first case report of an association of anetodermic cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma and a synchronous EBV-associated nodal Hodgkin lymphoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of DermatologySame topicDermatological and Skeletal DisordersFrench-language works237,207