MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294685347

Unit 11 Peoples and Countries说课设计

2014· article· zh· W2294685347 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wang Jing Yan

Bibliographic record

Venue新课程:小学 · 2014
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTowerHistoryOperaVisual artsArt historyArtArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Good morning,everyone!Today I’m very glad to be standing here and talking about Unit11 Peoples and Countries Lesson 62 in Book 4 of starting line primary English.PartⅠ.教学内容分析1.根据教学大纲并联系学生实际,制定如下教学目标a.知识目标学会并掌握六个短语和一些句型。Phrases:①Eiffel Tower②cherry blossom③Disneyland④CN Tower⑤Big Ben⑥Opera House Drills:Where does Edward come from?He comes from Canada.What is his city famous for?It’s famous for the CN Tower.b.能力目标训练学生的听说读写能力,提高他们的交际能力并鼓励他们

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue新课程:小学Same topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207