MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294730764

Exact and Heuristic Methods for Energy Pricing Problem

2016· preprint· en· W2294730764 on OpenAlexaff
Sezin Afşar, Luce Brotcorne, Patrice Marcotte, Gilles Savard

Bibliographic record

VenueLillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicEnergy (signal processing)Mathematical optimizationMathematical economicsComputer scienceEconomicsMathematicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics between a peak-minimizing and revenue-maximizing energy provider and its disutility-minimizing customers are analyzed in a bilevel setting in this paper. Customers' demand is delivered to a smart grid which acts as the follower and the provider decides on the prices as the leader. Different models that are based on the types of appliances that customers own are presented and solved by exact and heuristic methods that are developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille))Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207