MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294767448

Bayesian filtering with online Gaussian process latent variable models

2014· article· en· W2294767448 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGaussian processComputer scienceLatent variableMachine learningMixture modelArtificial intelligenceBayesian probabilityComponent (thermodynamics)Process (computing)Representation (politics)ComputationData miningGaussianAlgorithm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we present a novel non-parametric approach to Bayesian filtering, where the predic-tion and observation models are learned in an online fashion. Our approach is able to han-dle multimodal distributions over both models by employing a mixture model representation with Gaussian Processes (GP) based components. To cope with the increasing complexity of the esti-mation process, we explore two computationally efficient GP variants, sparse online GP and local GP, which help to manage computation require-ments for each mixture component. Our exper-iments demonstrate that our approach can track human motion much more accurately than exist-ing approaches that learn the prediction and ob-servation models offline and do not update these models with the incoming data stream. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it