MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2294925427 · doi:10.1109/est.2015.11

Depth Assisted Palm Region Extraction Using the Kinect v2 Sensor

2015· article· en· W2294925427 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUSableComputer scienceComputer visionRGB color modelPalmArtificial intelligenceMultispectral imageFeature extractionSensor fusionWindow (computing)Sliding window protocol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper evaluates the feasibility of using the fusion of multispectral data from a Kinect v2 sensor as a way to extract the palm region of hand in an unconstrained environment. The depth data was used to both track the hand and extract palm regions. This extracted palm region was then used to extract the palm region in the RGB and Near Infrared data. One of the underlying goals was to maintain real time performance and as such relatively simple techniques such as using a sliding window were used. The lower boundary of the usable frames extracted was 50%, while in the case when the user is positioned directly in front of the sensor with hands extended outward from the body, the percentage of usable frames reached 75%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207