Social Risk Screening for Pediatric Inpatients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This systematic review aims to identify existing social risk screening instruments applicable to hospitalized children (primary) and evaluate their content validity and methodological quality (secondary). Individual questions were abstracted and sorted by social risk theme. Content validity was evaluated by 13 hospital-based social workers. Methodological quality was assessed using the 108-item Consensus Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. A total of 1070 citations were evaluated and 146 articles were reviewed, which identified 44 unique instruments. No instrument was applicable to social risk in hospitalized children. Sixty-one percent of instruments focused on a single social risk theme and only 18% of instruments covered more than 5 themes. The 2 instruments with the highest combination of social worker endorsement and COSMIN scores each addressed only 1 social risk theme relevant to hospitalized children. A broad, content valid and methodologically strong social risk screening instrument for hospitalized children was not identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it