MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2295074686 · doi:10.5586/aa.1973.002

Ocena odporności kilku odmian pomidorów na Phytophthora infestans (Mont) de Bary [Estimation of resistance of several tomato varieties to Phytophthora infestans (Mont) de Bary]

2015· article· en· W2295074686 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Marcinkowska

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Agrobotanica · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytophthora infestansBiologyBlightHorticultureBotanyResistance (ecology)Agronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All the studied varieties of tomato were attacked by the late blight although they differed in their susceptibility. Slightly attacked varieties (New Yorker, Rockingham, West Virginia 63, N. H. Surecrop), moderatly attacked ones (En-terprizer, Najwcześniejszy, Ottawa 50, Wisconsin 55, Rhode Island Early) and strongly attacked ones (V 656, Summerdawn, Highlander) were distinguished.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa AgrobotanicaSame topicAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop ManagementFrench-language works237,207