MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2295293950 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511666315.002

Rank and determinant functions for matrices over semirings

2007· book-chapter· en· W2295293950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicFuzzy and Soft Set Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRank (graph theory)MathematicsCombinatoricsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The difference between semirings and rings is the lack of additive inverses in semirings. The most common examples of semirings which are not rings are the non-negative integers ℤ+, the non-negative rationals ℚ+ and the non-negative reals ℝ+ with usual addition and multiplication. There are classical examples of non-numerical semirings as well. One of the first examples appeared in the work of Dedekind in connection with the algebra of ideals of a commutative ring (one can add and multiply ideals but it is not possible to subtract them). Later Vandiver proposed the class of semirings as the best class of algebraic structures which includes both rings and bounded distributive lattices. Boolean algebras, max-algebras, tropical semirings and fuzzy scalars are other important examples of semirings. See the monographs for more details.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it