MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2295314895

Our Digital Selves: Privacy Issues in Online Behavioural Advertising

2013· article· en· W2295314895 on OpenAlex
Christopher Thomas Scott

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAppeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFreedom of Expression and Defamation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet privacyInformation privacyAdvertisingField (mathematics)Targeted advertisingStatuteLegal aspects of computingSubject (documents)Privacy policyOnline advertisingTracking (education)BusinessPersonally identifiable informationThe InternetPolitical scienceComputer scienceLawSociologyWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadians are spending more of their lives online than ever before.1 !is trend has profound ramifications across Canadian society, including within the field of privacy law. !is paper will examine the privacy implications of two related technologies within the emerging field of online behavioural advertising. !e first is the use of tracking cookies to track users’ activity across websites, and the second is deep packet inspection (“DPI”). !e use of these technologies in the field of targeted advertising has not yet been subject to a finding under the Personal Information and Protection of Electronic Documents Act (“PIPEDA” or the “Act”),2 the federal private-sector privacy statute.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it