MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2295344799 · doi:10.5376/mpb.cn.2011.09.0068

瓜叶菊F3H同源基因表达与花青素苷合成的相关性分析

2011· article· zh· W2295344799 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
孙翊

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2011
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Gene Expression Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

为了探讨瓜叶菊黄烷酮3-羟基化酶(flavanone 3-hydroxylase, F3H)在类黄酮生物合成途径中的作用,本文作者以瓜叶菊( Pericallis cruenta L′Herit; Senecio cruentus Masson ex L′Herit)不同色系品种作为实验材料,分析基因表达与色素成分之间的关系。类黄酮成分的紫外-可见吸收光谱分析表明,红色系、紫色系、蓝色系舌状花中既含有花青素又含有花黄素,而白色系舌状花中仅含有花黄素。Southern blot检测发现, F3H 同源基因在不含有花青素苷的白色和含有花青素苷的蓝色瓜叶菊基因组上均至少分布有2个拷贝。Northern blot分析结果显示,两种颜色的瓜叶菊舌状花中均具有 F3H 同源基因的转录本,且表达水平均相同,与是否含有花青素苷并不直接相关。上述研究结果表明:瓜叶菊中 F3H 同源基因可能不仅参与了花青素苷的合成,还参与了花黄素的合成。根据这一研究结果还可以推测出,白色系与其他色系瓜叶菊之间的花色差异是在 F3H 基因之后的合成步骤中产生的,因此瓜叶菊白色系品种可以作为研究花青素苷合成途径中 F3H 基因下游其他基因功能的良好受体材料。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicPlant Gene Expression AnalysisFrench-language works237,207