Exploiting Sentinel 5's Synergy with IRS and 3MI on METOP-SG for Protocol Monitoring and Air Quality-Climate Interaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Last Year's unprecedented low ozone episode in the Arctic (March 2011) made again clear that it is important to continue to monitor the ozone layer in support of the Montreal Protocol. Although scientists showed that the developments at the Arctic could be fully understood and explained by the same heterogeneous chemistry as is used for the SP hole (G. Manney et al., Nature, 2011) , an ozone destruction of that order was not seen before at the NP. Continuation of monitoring the Ozone Layer in order to detect the expected recovery of the ozone layer is therefore of paramount importance. Both S5-Precursor (S5P)/TROPOMI as well as Sentinel5 will play a crucial role in that monitoring capacity. A new capacity of sentinel 5 will be synergistic use of data and synergistic retrievals from Sentinel 5, the IRS instrument and 3MI, all mounted on the same METOP-SG platform. Combination of CO, O3 and CH4 measurements of the Sentinel 5 and IRS instrument will enable distinction of lower tropospheric, PBL related, concentrations from free tropospheric amounts. These combined retrievals will largely benefit from the fact that the same air mass is sensed at the same time. Synergistic analyses of the aerosol measurements of 3MI and the AQ pollutants measured by Sentinel 5 and IRS will for the first time provide a co-located and synergistic data base that can be used for studying secondary aerosol formation. Secondary aerosol formation is the largest unknown contribution to the total aerosol load of the atmosphere, which is in turn the largest unknown factor in the anthropogenic climate forcing. Moreover, these co-located trace gas and aerosol measurements are essential for further understanding of the relation between climate change and air quality (Shindell, Science, 2009). 3MI will be the only instrument in that timeframe with the needed detailed aerosol detection capacity for this type of analyses. The presentation will elaborate on the importance of the monitoring capacity of Sentinel 5 and S5P, and the new insights the synergistic use of the data sets of Sentinel 5, IRS and 3MI will provide for air quality and climate change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".