MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2295454748 · doi:10.5555/2615731.2617421

Gauss meets Canadian traveler: shortest-path problems with correlated natural dynamics

2014· article· en· W2295454748 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTraverseTree traversalMathematical optimizationGaussian processVariety (cybernetics)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionGraphArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceGaussianAlgorithmMathematicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a variety of real world problems from robot navigation to logistics, agents face the challenge of path optimization on a graph with unknown edge costs. These settings can be generally formalized as the Canadian Traveler Problems (CTPs) [?]. Although in many applications the edge costs have dependencies resulting from world dynamics, CTPs with such structure have received considerably less attention than those with independent edge costs, largely because the dependence structure is often problem-specific and difficult to state compactly. Yet, in a wide variety of navigation tasks, spatial correlations between edge traversal costs are governed by natural phenomena such as winds, congestion, or ocean currents, which are conveniently described with a well-understood machine learning model — Gaussian Process (GP). In this article, we propose a synthesis of CTPs and GPs, the Gaussian Traveler Problem (GTP). In GTPs, an agent observes the costs of graph edges when traversing them, and uses the observed costs to adjust its belief over other edges via Gaussian Process updates. Examples of GTP instances include aircraft, traffic, and vessel navigation, to name just a few. Computing optimal agent behavior for a GTP turns out to be equivalent to solving a Partially Observable MDP with continuous observation space. We present an approximate algorithm for solving GTPs with efficient machine-learning and decision-making components, whose design is influenced by the challenges of real-world problems. Despite the intractability of computing an optimal policy, our experiments in the aircraft navigation scenario with real wind data demonstrate that our framework can significantly improve upon state-of-the-art techniques for planning airplane routes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it