Evaluación del mejoramiento integral de barrios: el caso Proyecto Sur con Bogotá.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[EN] The purpose of this thesis is to argue that the effectiveness of programs of integral development in neighborhoods relies on the diversification of all levels of intervention¿including physical, social, economic, organizational, and environmental factors. This study focuses on three of these interrelated components: a public works component, a social development component, and an institutional strengthening component. Diverse stakeholders in each territory should define the lines of action within each component; institutional strengthening should ensure continuity of the processes over time. To this end, such a component should include one or more elements that undertake the management and intervention of all diverse stakeholders instead of the execution of the projects and activities. The main focus should be on organizing and involving the community.\n\nThe content of this thesis is organized as follows: introduction; two chapters; summary and conclusions; bibliography and annexes.\n\nThe first chapter is divided into three periods of time. The first of these addresses the international, national, and local antecedents of the First United Nations Conference on Human Settlements celebrated in Vancouver, Canada in 1976. A second period centers itself on the guidelines established during the First United Nations Conference on Human Settlements celebrated in Istanbul, Turkey in 1996. The third time period reviews the commitments acquired after the second Conference of United Nations until today. In all three of these periods the international guidelines -- as well as the commitments acquired there -- have impacted National Development Plans and the interventions at a local level. This paper includes commentary about one such local level intervention, made in the city of Bogotá.\n\nChapter two, studies the SUR Neighborhood Integral Project of Improvement with Bogotá. This project sought the institutionalization of a replicable model of integral development in zones in the city of Bogota. \n\nEven though there have been many interventions of integral improvements undertaken in Bogotá, there has not been any research done to date that demonstrates specifically the relationship among the different components of intervention in the programs of integral improvement of neighborhoods. This academic work seeks to fulfill this emptiness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".