MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2295664350 · doi:10.1109/icip.2015.7351628

Multi-resolution compressed sensing reconstruction via approximate message passing

2015· article· en· W2295664350 on OpenAlexaff
Xing Wang, Jie Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompressed sensingSignal reconstructionComputer scienceMean squared errorSIGNAL (programming language)AlgorithmIterative reconstructionMessage passingBounded functionSampling (signal processing)Resolution (logic)Reconstruction algorithmSignal processingArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider multi-resolution (MR) compressed sensing reconstruction, where instead of always reconstructing the signal at the original high resolution (HR), we enable the reconstruction of a better-quality low-resolution (LR) signal when the sampling rate is too low. We propose an approximate message passing (AMP)-based solution (MR-AMP). Theoretical analyses show that in addition to reduced complexity, our method can produce a LR signal with bounded mean squared error (MSE) even when the MSE of the conventional HR reconstruction is unbounded. The performance of the proposed scheme is verified using both synthetic data and natural images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207