MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2295712623

ualberta at TAC-KBP 2012: English and Cross-Lingual Entity Linking.

2012· article· en· W2295712623 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueTheory and applications of categories · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicData Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEntity linkingKnowledge baseAmbiguityInformation retrievalConstruct (python library)Task (project management)Information extractionPaceNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On one hand, the proliferation of the Web has generated massive information in an unorganized way and is still growing in an accelerating pace. On the other hand, structured and queryable knowledge bases are very difficult to construct and update. Automatic knowledge base construction techniques are greatly needed to convert the rich Web information into useful knowledge bases. Besides information extraction, ambiguities about entities and facts also need to be resolved. Entity Linking, which links an extracted named entity to an entity in a knowledge base, is to solve this ambiguity before populating knowledge. In this paper, we describe ualberta’s system for the 2012 TAC-KBP English and Cross-Lingual Entity Linking (EL) task, and report the result on the evaluation datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it