Production and Characterization of Phospholipases C from some Bacillus thuringiensis Isolates Recovered from Egyptian Soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI) involves the internal simulation of a movement and its sensory outcomes. Although definitions of MI exclude overt execution of the imagined movement, this exclusion does not mean that motor system is inactive during MI. In fact, most accounts of MI are based on the premise that the neural codes activated during overt movement execution are also active during MI, though at a sub-threshold level. Evidence for the sub-threshold activation of motor codes during MI has been drawn from studies using behavioural and neurophysiological methods. Behaviourally, small muscle contractions and micromovements that resemble the imagined movements can be observed during MI; a phenomenon termed motor overflow. Neurophysiologically, changes in the magnitudes of involuntary muscle contractions that have been evoked via transcranial magnetic stimulation can be detected during or after MI. The present talk will consist of a review of these methods and of the new understandings of MI that have been generated using these methods including: how task experience shapes MI and how individual differences in MI ability are related to adaptation following MI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".