MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Postnatal impairments of auditory acuity and neural transmission times induced by maternal iron deficiency

2010· article· en· W2295743852 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jean‐Luc Jougleux, France M. Rioux, Michael W. Church, Sylvain Fiset, Marc E. Surette

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MonctonUniversity of OttawaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffspringBrainstemPregnancyLactationGestationCentral nervous systemAudiologyPhysiologyMedicineBiologyEndocrinologyPsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iron deficiency (ID) is believed to affect central nervous system (CNS) on several aspects such as myelinogenesis, neurotransmitter synthesis and brain fatty acid metabolism. While most findings in humans investigated ID during post natal periods, our study aimed to evaluate consequences of moderate maternal ID on CNS development in guinea pig offspring. We used auditory brainstem response (ABR) to assess neurophysiologic auditory function and neural transmission times (NTT). Females were fed an iron sufficient (IS) or deficient (ID) diet during the gestation and lactation periods. ID appeared in the third trimester of pregnancy for the ID group. On post natal day 9 (PND9), an IS diet was introduced to wean offspring from both groups. ABR was measured on PND24 using descending intensities and various frequencies (2 to 32 kHz). ID pups had significantly elevated ABR thresholds (hearing loss) at 2, 16 and 32 kHz. NTT seemed to demonstrate shorter inter peak latencies for offspring born to ID dams. A delay in the appearance of the first neural nucleus is likely to be the explanation, whereas later relays did not differ among the two groups. Our study demonstrates that a moderate maternal ID adversely impairs the auditory functions of pups born to ID females. These results suggest that maternal ID may alter the CNS myelinogenesis in the progeny. Support: Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Canada Research Chairs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicIron Metabolism and Disorders→French-language works237,207→