High dynamic range map estimation via fully connected random fields with stochastic cliques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reconstruction of high dynamic range (HDR) images via conventional camera systems and low dynamic range (LDR) images is a growing field of research in image acquisition. The radiance map associated with the HDR image of a scene is typically computed using multiple images of the same scene captured at different exposures (i.e., bracketed LDR imzages). This approach, though inexpensive, is sensitive to noise under high camera ISO. Each bracketed image is associated with a different level of noise due to the change in exposure time, and the noise is further amplified when tone-mapping the HDR image for display. A new framework is proposed to address the associated noise in the context of random fields. The estimation of the HDR image from a set of LDR images is formulated as a stochastically fully connected conditional random field where the spatial information is incorporated to compute the HDR value in combination with the LDR image values. Experimental results show that the proposed framework compensated the non-stationary ISO noise while preserving the boundaries in the estimated HDR images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".