MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296076137

The New Postsecondary Landscape.

2013· article· en· W2296076137 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cathy Sandeen

Bibliographic record

VenueContinuing higher education review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Innovations and Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEducational attainmentHigher educationPostsecondary educationEquity (law)PopulationDemographic economicsFace (sociological concept)Economic growthSocioeconomic statusPolitical scienceSociologyGeographyDemographyEconomicsSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quotation from the website of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation sums up the issues we face in all sectors of higher education today, public and private: How do we do much more with far less than we have done in the past? The United States has long prided itself on having one of the most highly educated populations in the world, but that is no longer the case. Over the past decade, the proportion of the population with a postsecondary degree has increased far more significantly in other advanced economies than in the US, particularly among young people. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 2012), only 42 percent of young Americans age 25-34 currently hold an associate’s degree or higher. Contrast that with South Korea at 65 percent, Japan at 57 percent and Canada at 56 percent (OECD, 2012, p. 36). Moreover, 63 percent of US jobs are projected to require some level of postsecondary education by 2018 (Carnevale, et al., 2010, p. 14). On a social level, postsecondary attainment has always been an important means for providing social equity and economic mobility to US citizens. There is a

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContinuing higher education reviewSame topicEducational Innovations and ChallengesFrench-language works237,207