O caminho até Tsihlqot´in. O reconhecimento dos títulos nativos no Canadá e as lições de Tsihlqot´in vs. British Columbia para o direito brasileiro
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada in June 2014 on the Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia marks a development in Canadian Aboriginal rights as it defines the occupational pattern worthy of legal protection. In short, the ruling highlighted that indigenous land rights protected by law should not be assessed according to the same parameters employed in non-indigenous law. The article outlines the way in which the recognition of indigenous titles has evolved in Canadian law and traces a parallel with the characteristics of the recognition of indigenous territories in Brazilian law, suggesting similarities between the Canadian and Brazilian legal systems, particularly in light of the decision taken by the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court in the Raposa/Serra do Sol case (Petition no. 3388/State of Roraima).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it