MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296114582 · doi:10.7202/1033277ar

Derecho a la Ciudad, Mujeres y Seguridad Ciudadana en los Gobiernos Locales

2015· article· es· W2296114582 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ana Falú

Bibliographic record

VenueÉconomie et solidarités · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El articulo aborda las violencias en las ciudades del siglo XXI, tanto las que se experimenta como las que se temen, las cuales son problemas centrales de la sociedad y los gobiernos y afectan el ejercicio de los derechos ciudadanos. El mismo elabora alrededor de la construcción identitaria de las mujeres cómo ciudadanas, con derechos a su ciudad, a una vida sin violencias en el ámbito publico y privado. Violencias y miedos que vivencian de manera aleatoria por el solo hecho de ser mujeres en la persistencia de valores patriarcales, los cuales siguen intentando sujetarlas a significaciones de objetos de derecho y no como sujetos de derechos a sus ciudades. Finalmente se identifican los llamados nudos críticos que afectan en general al avance de las políticas de igualdad de oportunidades y derechos en la región, particularmente en los gobiernos municipales. Cierra con algunas consideraciones recuperando el aporte de las mujeres organizadas y las redes feministas especializadas en sus capacidades de incidir en la agenda internacional y local.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0090.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉconomie et solidaritésSame topicSocial Sciences and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207