MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296133061

Rethinking Kindergarten Education in the Republic of Korea: Based on the Assessment Practices

2010· article· en· W2296133061 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly childhood education · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Systems and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarly childhood educationEarly childhoodEarly childhood teacherPsychologyThe RepublicPedagogyDevelopmental psychologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contemporary early childhood education has changed markedly and rapidly in the world. Investigating the contemporary early childhood education including current issues in the early childhood education settings in the Republic of Korea is helpful to recognize what urgent problems are in the field of early childhood education and to find a solution to the problems. The purpose of this study is, therefore, (a) to understand urgent problems in early childhood education in Korea, and (b) to suggest directions for early childhood education in Korea on the influence of assessment on children`s development and learning in kindergarten and beyond. In order to suggest directions for early childhood education in the Republic of Korea on the influence of assessment on children`s development and learning, the following concerns are discussed: (a) alternative assessment methods, (b) teacher-training programs, and (c) the teacher`s efficient use of after-school hours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it