MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296144776 · doi:10.1109/tr.2015.2451617

Exact Inference for Laplace Quantile, Reliability, and Cumulative Hazard Functions Based on Type-II Censored Data

2015· article· en· W2296144776 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Reliability · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantileEstimatorMathematicsStatisticsLaplace transformConfidence intervalInferenceHazardReliability (semiconductor)Scale parameterOrder statisticReliability theoryQuantile functionApplied mathematicsProbability density functionCumulative distribution functionComputer scienceFailure rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we first present explicit expressions for the maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) of the location, and scale parameters of the Laplace distribution based on a Type-II right censored sample under different cases. Then, after giving the exact density functions of the MLEs, and the expectations, we derive the exact density of the MLE of the quantile, and utilize it to develop exact confidence intervals for the population quantile. We also briefly discuss the MLEs of reliability and cumulative hazard functions, and how to develop exact confidence intervals for these functions. These results can also be extended to any linear estimators. Finally, we present two examples to illustrate the inferential methods developed here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it