Culture de sécurité et gestion du risque dans une entreprise de production de lait uruguayenne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le travail analyse les politiques de gestion du risque dans l’entreprise de production de lait plus importante de l’Uruguay. Le modèle de sécurité de l’entreprise repose autour de normes et dispositifs élaborés par les experts en sécurité, mais la normalisation de la déviance est une pratique permanente de l’entreprise, ce qui reste efficacité aux politiques de gestion du risque instrumentées par la direction. Si bien la sécurité est une valeur explicite dans le discours de l’organisation, les supposés de base de la culture organisationnelle s’articule autour de la productivité et des exigences de qualité de la production. Ce décalage entre valeurs explicites et supposées de base s’exprime dans l’inversion qui fait l’entreprise pour acheter des éléments de protection personnelle et en équipements technologiques de sécurité, inversion qui n’est pas accompagnée de la préoccupation pour développer des dispositifs pour exiger aux travailleurs d’utiliser ces équipements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".