MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296192841 · doi:10.7603/s40872-015-0001-8

Characterization of Phytic acid in Tempered Canned Red kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) using Raman Spectroscopy

2016· article· en· W2296192841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGSTF Journal on Agricultural Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytase and its Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhaseolusRaman spectroscopyPhytic acidSpectroscopyChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Congo redNuclear chemistryMaterials scienceFood scienceChromatographyBotanyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rapid and non-invasive analytical method for quality control is a priority for the food industry, hence the objective of this study is to use Raman spectroscopy (RS) to identify phytic acid in RKB. Phytic Acid was extracted from treated ground dry RKB, while standard concentration of PA was prepared from a PA solution 50% w/w. Extracted samples and standard solutions were analyzed using the RS. The laser light beams focused on the PA samples generated molecular bond vibrations which resulted to inelastic scattering of photons in the light beam. The result showed that P-O-C, and P=O which are bonds identified with PA emitted light intensities at wavelength 858.13, and 1198.04 nm, respectively. Correlation (0.93) was established between results obtained for the standard RAMAN spectroscopy method and UV spectrophotometric method. Canned BL treatments showed increased concentration with blanched samples with lowest concentration (0.1175 g/mL) for P-O-C. Thus, the correlation established is indicative that the RS has potential applications in the food industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it