MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296221246

The Approximability and Integrality Gap of Interval Stabbing and Independence Problems

2012· article· en· W2296221246 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Conference on Computational Geometry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsRectangleCombinatoricsInterval (graph theory)Linear programmingIndependence (probability theory)Approximation algorithmSet (abstract data type)Discrete mathematicsDuality (order theory)Independent setUpper and lower boundsPlane (geometry)Duality gapMathematical optimizationOptimization problemGraphComputer scienceStatisticsMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by problems such as rectangle stabbing in the plane, we study the minimum hitting set and maximum independent set problems for families of d-intervals and d-union-intervals. We obtain the following: (1) constructions yielding asymptotically tight lower bounds on the integrality gaps of the associated natural linear programming relaxations; (2) an LP-relative dapproximation for the hitting set problem ond-intervals; (3) a proof that the approximation ratios for independent set on families of 2-intervals and 2-union-intervals can be improved to match tight duality gap lower bounds obtained via topological arguments, if one has access to an oracle for a PPAD-complete problem related to nding Borsuk-Ulam xed-points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it