Bibliographic record
Abstract
Guillaume Apollinaire apparaît comme un passeur entre deux siècles, mais aussi entre deux âges de la poésie. Son lyrisme offre un versant ludique à registres multiples (humour, ironie, comique), qui interroge la relation entre poésie et rire dans le contexte moderniste du jeune xxe siècle, entre tradition de l’esprit fumiste et essor du surréalisme. On propose quelques repères dans son parcours sous l’angle des formes poétiques, et plus particulièrement de la rime, lieu d’élection de l’équivoque. Ses textes manifestent des tensions entre héritage et subversion à travers diverses figures littéraires : la réception contrastée des Parnassiens Banville et Coppée, mais aussi la veine ironique d’Allais et Jarry, qu’Apollinaire oriente vers l’autodérision dans le conte « Le poète assassiné ». Sa création poétique oscille entre « l’Ordre » et « l’Aventure », du souvenir de la rime équivoque au déploiement du calembour comme principe dynamique du vers libre. Le choix des trois pièces poétiques mineures retenues par Breton dans son Anthologie de l’humour noir apporte un éclairage sur l’ambivalence de la postérité d’Apollinaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".