MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296426763 · doi:10.1109/cjece.2015.2436054

Feasible Generalized Least Squares Estimation of Channel and Noise Covariance Matrices for MIMO Systems

2016· article· en· W2296426763 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mohamed Lassaad Ammari, Paul Fortier, Mohamad El Khaled

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCovariance matrixMathematicsEstimatorEstimation of covariance matricesCramér–Rao boundCovarianceAlgorithmNoise (video)Least-squares function approximationStatisticsEstimation theoryApplied mathematicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the performances of multiple-input multiple-output channel and noise covariance estimation in the presence of correlated noise. The Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) for the estimated parameters are evaluated. The optimal training sequence is designed in order to minimize the CRLB of the channel matrix estimation. When the noise covariance matrix is available, the minimum variance and unbiased estimator of the channel matrix corresponds to the generalized least squares (GLS) estimator. When the covariance matrix is unknown, we propose use of the feasible GLS technique. We prove that this two-step procedure is asymptotically equivalent to the GLS algorithm. The theoretical analysis is confirmed by Monte Carlo simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207