MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296478018 · doi:10.1109/icip.2015.7351094

Multi-exposure image fusion: A patch-wise approach

2015· article· en· W2296478018 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceRGB color modelComputer scienceComputer visionImage fusionColor imagePixelImage (mathematics)Key (lock)SIGNAL (programming language)Pattern recognition (psychology)Image processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a patch-wise approach for multi-exposure image fusion (MEF). A key step in our approach is to decompose each color image patch into three conceptually independent components: signal strength, signal structure and mean intensity. Upon processing the three components separately based on patch strength and exposedness measures, we uniquely reconstruct a color image patch and place it back into the fused image. Unlike most pixel-wise MEF methods in the literature, the proposed algorithm does not require significant pre/postprocessing steps to improve visual quality or to reduce spatial artifacts. Moreover, the novel patch decomposition allows us to handle RGB color channels jointly and thus produces fused images with more vivid color appearances. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm both qualitatively and quantitatively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations115
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207