MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296488053 · doi:10.1109/icmew.2015.7169853

Cloud based virtualization for a calorie measurement e-health mobile application

2015· article· en· W2296488053 on OpenAlexaff
Sri Vijay Bharat Peddi, Abdulsalam Yassine, Shervin Shirmohammadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingVirtualizationMobile cloud computingServerFlexibility (engineering)Distributed computingMobile computingComputation offloadingEmbedded systemEdge computingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smartphones have transformed people approach towards technology. It not only empowers them to use it for communication but also for tracking and maintaining health-fitness via mobile applications. With the increasing number of complex mobile applications, the mobile, with its limited resources (in terms of the computational power and storage capacity) cannot efficiently run these applications autonomously. Similarly our e-health mobile application (Eat Healthy Stay Healthy) requires a platform to run highly computational intensive algorithms like the deep learning (for recognizing food images) and calorie measurement would need higher processing power to perform optimally. We propose a cloud based virtualization model that provides our e-health application with the required computational power that it needs to perform efficiently and at the same time would also give it the flexibility to make use of the various cloud resources. Our model comprises of concepts like virtual swap between various mobile sessions that assist the system for faster processing and intelligent decision mechanism for distributing the task of image processing to cloud servers. By implementing intelligent decision mechanism, the final calorie computation significantly improved by 20.5% while implementing deep learning in cloud.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207