MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296588746 · doi:10.1109/fbw.2011.5967626

SHM implementation

2011· article· en· W2296588746 on OpenAlexaff
Nezih Mrad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaDepartment of National Defence
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural health monitoringAerospaceComputer scienceScale (ratio)Risk analysis (engineering)Systems engineeringConstruction engineeringTransport engineeringEngineeringBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After labor and fuel, maintenance represents the third costly expense in operational support of both regional and national carriers. These maintenance cost generally represent 15-18% of the operational costs and are estimated to be approximately 67% of the total ownership cost. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), a subset of Integrated Vehicle Health Management (IVHM), is seen as an approach to decrease operation and support costs down to a more desirable 50%. For the past several years, several organizations have been investigating and conducting research in the area of SHM with an end objective of conducting fall scale SHM demonstration activities to enhance platform availability through the adoption of advanced maintenance concepts, technologies and methodologies. This document provides an overview of structural health monitoring technology. It introduces the development of emerging concepts and technologies and it discusses several implementation challenges within the aerospace field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207