Combinational Multiphoton Scanning Microscopy and Multiphoton Surgery of Mouse Arteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preliminary investigations were carried out in order to explore the potential of laser-stimulated capillary growth in a blood vessel-on-a-chip. To fulfill the project objective, a series of experiments in both directions of two photon \nfluorescence imaging and laser-semitransparent materials interaction were performed. A purpose-built two-photon \nfluorescence imaging resolution was tested by imaging 1 micron diameter fluorescent beads. Also, the potential of fluorescence imaging in the waveguide writing eld as well as the biological eld was studied. Further, for laser ablation on the mouse artery loaded in the microfluidic channel, the processing window was found such that the damage induced by femtosecond laser just a effects the artery, not the other interfaces of the microfluidic chip. At the end, the result of laser trepanning on the mouse artery wall combined with two photon fluorescence imaging was shown. These results will be useful for more advanced\nbiological study such as angiogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".