MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296622450 · doi:10.11575/prism/28616

Using Ground-penetrating Radar and Seismic Shothole Drillers’ Logs to Identify Massive Ice and Taliks in the Lower Mackenzie Corridor and the Colville Hills, Northwest Territories

2013· dissertation· en· W2296622450 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel O'Dell

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGround-penetrating radarSeismologyGeomorphologyRadarEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding of the distribution of massive ice and near surface taliks on a regional scale can offer important insights into the geomorphology, hydrology and quaternary geology in regions underlain by permafrost. These features are poorly constrained within the lower Mackenzie Valley and in the Colville Hills, two areas with the potential for hydrocarbon extraction. This thesis used ground-penetrating radar to identify massive ice and taliks at two sites in the lower Arctic of the Northwest Territories. Lithostratigraphic data taken from shothole drillers’ logs at Little Chicago, in the lower Mackenzie Corridor, and Lac des Bois, in the Colville Hills, act as a complement to shallow geophysical surveying undertaken in March of 2009. Three occurrences of massive ice and one talik were identified at the two study sites. The combined effectiveness, and the limitations, of ground-penetrating and seismic shothole drillers’ logs were examined in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207