Droit civil, condition ouvrière et transition au capitalisme industriel au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Cet article propose une reconstitution du régime juridique avec lequel devait composer la classe ouvrière au Québec, de l’adoption du Code civil du Bas-Canada en 1866 à la mise en place d’une législation provinciale sur les accidents de travail, en 1909. L’examen des règles de droit relatives au salariat contredit de manière assez franche l’idéal libéral d’égalité juridique formelle des citoyens : à bien des égards, la marginalisation des travailleurs est inscrite au cœur même du droit civil québécois du temps. Cependant, la province de Québec revoit assez fréquemment, durant cette période, le contenu du code civil et du code de procédure civile applicable aux ouvriers. Le caractère limité de ces réformes, pour certaines complexes et difficiles à concrétiser, traduirait une espèce d’épuisement du recours à la juridicisation du social en tant que réponse à l’ébranlement de la société sous les coups du salariat, de ses risques et de ses fragilités.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".