MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296784530 · doi:10.14288/1.0052381

Factors affecting the permeability of gas shales

2009· article· en· W2296784530 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringGeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanical properties and matrix permeability of gas shales are the most important properties in determining their production capacity. In this research, I have investigated the matrix permeability and rock mechanical properties of Western Canadian and Woodford shales. The matrix permeability was measured using pulse decay experiment. The pulse decay experiment was employed with triaxial experiments combined with mercury porosimetry, helium pydnometry, Rock-Eval pyrolysis, SEM and X-ray diffraction analysis to measure rock strength, pore size, porosity, total organic content, fabric and composition of samples. The permeability results were correlated with effective stress, anisotropy, fabric, rock strength, porosity, pore size and total organic content. Mineralogy plays an important role in determining the permeability of Canadian and Woodford shales. Higher permeability was observed in samples with high clay content, and low permeability was observed in samples with high quartz and carbonate content. Among the clay-, silica-, and calcite-rich Canadian shales, the calcite-rich shales had a very low permeability (1O⁻⁷ md) compared to other shales. The permeability of all shales decline exponentially with increasing effective stress. Samples that were tested parallel to bedding had higher permeabilities than samples were tested normal to bedding. Among shales, the quartz-rich shales showed differences of three to four orders of magnitude for the samples tested parallel to bedding, compared to those tested normal to the bedding. The largest anisotropy was found in the clay-rich samples. Clay-rich shales also have a well developed fabric with a strongly preferred orientation, while the quartz-rich shales had random orientation of the fabric. The porosimetry results suggest that fluid flow is mostly in the meso (2-50 nm) and macro pores (>50 nm) of the Woodford shales. Samples with higher clay content (>30%) showed a higher intrusion volume in macro pores, while samples with higher quartz content showed intrusion volume in micro pores. Porosity is correlated to permeability in the Western Canadian shales and showed a linear correlation within the Woodford shales. Even though calcite-rich Canadian shales and quartz-rich Woodford shales have high TOC content, TOC was not seen to effect permeability. Triaxial compression rock testing was conducted on the Woodford shales to measure the elastic properties and strength behaviour of shale. Lithologic composition plays an important role in the strength and pore compressibility of shale. Quartz-rich or carbonate rich shales have a brittle behaviour and clay-rich shales have a ductile behaviour. Pore compressibility is greater in the clay-rich shales, and less in the quartz-rich shales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it