MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Treatment of pediatric lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (LPHL): A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

2013· article· en· W2296845301 on OpenAlexaff
Burton Appel, Lu Chen, R. Hutchison, David Hodgson, Peter F. Ehrlich, Louis S. Constine, Cindy L. Schwartz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVincristineStage (stratigraphy)CyclophosphamideRadiation therapySurgeryPrednisoneChemotherapyLymphomaInternal medicineLymph nodeGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10000 Background: LPHL, an uncommon subtype of HL, typically presents with low stage disease and responds to regimens used for classical HL. Recurrence is uncommon, but second malignant neoplasms (SMN) or development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) can occur. Therefore, reducing radiation exposure may be of benefit. We report the results of a prospective trial in which a selected subset of patients had surgery alone and the remainder were treated with limited chemotherapy +/- involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT). Methods: Patients ages 0-21 years with newly diagnosed, low risk LPHL were eligible for AHOD03P1. Low risk was defined as clinical Stage IA or IIA without bulk disease (mediastinal mass > 1/3 of the thoracic diameter or nodal aggregate > 6 cm). Patients with Stage IA LPHL with an unresected node or more than a single involved node or Stage IIA were treated with 3 cycles of AV-PC (doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone/cyclophosphamide). Patients with Stage IA LPHL in a single node that was completely resected were initially observed without further therapy; those who recurred after surgery with low risk LPHL received AV-PC x 3. Patients with < complete response (CR) to AV-PC x 3 received 2100 cGY IFRT. Results: 180 eligible patients with low risk LPHL were enrolled and completed study therapy. 52 patients underwent initial surgery alone; their 3 year EFS = 81.5%. 137 patients received AV-PC x 3; 128 were treated at diagnosis and 9 upon relapsing after surgery alone. 11 patients receiving AV-PC had < CR and received IFRT. 12 first events occurred among these 137 patients (11 relapses and 1 SMN, a NHL). One relapse occurred in a patient who received IFRT. The median follow-up among the 125 remaining patients is 39 (range 3 -76) months. Current 4-year EFS estimate is 88.1% (95% CI: 79.5%-93.3%) for these 137 patients. 4 year EFS for the entire cohort of 180 patients = 86.2%; their overall survival (OS) is 100%. Conclusions: Pediatric LPHL patients have an excellent EFS with chemotherapy that is less intensive than standard regimens; >90% of patients can avoid RT. NHL as a first event may be related to the underlying LPHL and not an effect of treatment. The salvage rate for the few relapses is high, and OS to date is excellent. Clinical trial information: NCT00107198.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→