MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2296865351 · doi:10.3917/rda.173.0051

L’activité de Bastiano Torrigiani sous le pontificat de Grégoire XIII

2011· article· fr· W2296865351 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emmanuel Lamouche

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l Art · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChapelSculptureArtPossession (linguistics)SAINTBronzeQuarter (Canadian coin)ClassicsHumanitiesArt historyAncient historyHistoryArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bastiano Torrigiani (Bologna, around 1542 - Rome, 1596) was a bronze founder of Bolognese origin, active in Rome between 1573 and 1596. He is above all known for the large bronze casts done for Sixtus V (1585-1590) and for Clement VIII (1592-1605), which made him famous, and which his biographer Giovanni Baglione enumerated in his Vite in 1642. On the other hand less is known about his career in the preceding years, especially under the pontificate of Gregory XIII (1572-1585). The present article concentrates on this part of Torrigiani's life elucidated by previously unpublished documents discovered in the archives in Rome. In them appears the pathway of an artist who receives relatively numerous commissions from the pope and his entourage, in particular for the pontifical chapel in Saint Peter's Basilica, the Gregorian Chapel. At this time Torrigiani was in possession of the workshop collection of Guglielmo Della Porta, whose assistant he had been. This study seeks to link the unpublished documents to the filiations between the Bolognese artist and his former master, in order to contribute to the history of sculpture and the decorative arts around the workshop of a founder in Rome in the last quarter of the 16th century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l ArtSame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207