Integration of summer and fall cover crops in vegetable cropping systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The demand for locally produced vegetables is growing in the Midwest, including Iowa. However, since vegetables are a small fraction of total cropland in the state, little research exists on approaches and techniques to increase the sustainability of vegetable production systems. Including cover crops in vegetable crop rotations can contribute to sustainability in vegetable cropping systems. This research investigated the integration of summer and fall cover crops in vegetable cropping systems to reduce weeds and nutrient leaching, improve soil chemical and biological properties, and enhance crop growth, yield, and produce quality. Cover crops studied in this research included buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum), cereal rye (Secale cereal), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum), oats (Avena strigosa), oilseed radish (Raphanus sativus var. oleifera), and sorghum-sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor ssp. drummondii). Effects of these cover crops were tested on fall production of cabbage (Brassica oleracea ‘Caraflex’) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa ‘Adriana’) and spring production of potato (Solanum tuberosum ‘Yukon Gold’ and ‘Red Pontiac’).\nIn vegetable cropping systems, weeds have been traditionally managed through tillage or chemicals. With growing awareness and demand for sustainably grown produce, growers are interested in using weed control strategies that could provide environmental benefits. Two of the studies conducted as part of this research investigated effects of four cover crops (buckwheat, cowpea, oats, and sorghum-sudangrass) on fall cabbage and lettuce production. Both studies were a split-plot randomized complete block design with cover crops as the whole plot and planting date of the vegetable as the subplot factor. Two planting dates were tested (immediately after or eight days after cover crop soil incorporation). The third study investigated the effect of fall planted cover crops (cereal rye, crimson clover, and oilseed radish) on soil nutrient concentrations, weed populations and growth, yield and quality of the successive spring potato crop. The study was a Latin square split-plot design with cover crop as the whole plot and potato cultivars as the subplot factor. All three studies included a no cover crop plot as a control treatment.\nThe first two studies clearly showed that cover crops can be used to help manage weeds during the summer time before planting of a fall vegetable crop. Cover crop biomass was highest for sorghum-sudangrass. Cowpea cover crop produced the lowest biomass. Buckwheat was the best cover crop at suppressing weeds while cowpea did not sufficient weed suppression. All cover crops did suppress weeds compared to the control. In the cabbage study, cowpea had a positive effect on soil nitrate concentration and produced the highest marketable cabbage yields (10,654 and 7,838 kg.ha-1 in 2013 and 2014, respectively). There was trending evidence that the sorghum-sudangrass cover crop detrimentally affected the growth and yield of the cabbage crop. Between the two planting times, early planting (immediately after cover crop soil incorporation) seemed to benefit cabbage yield only in the cowpea treatment. Results in the lettuce study were very similar. Cowpea shortened the time to harvest for the lettuce crop. The decrease in days to maturity was a minimum of 5 d in 2013 to 13 d in 2014. The early planting also showed evidence in decreasing the days to maturity. In 2014 planting immediately after soil incorporation of buckwheat and the control treatments, decreased the days to maturity of the lettuce crop than those planted eight days after soil incorporation of the buckwheat and control treatments.\nThe third study with fall planted cover crops, examined how cover crops influenced soil nitrogen, weeds and yield of the following potato crop. Positive effects were seen from the cover crops on increasing soil nitrogen and decreasing weed populations but, the advantages were short lived. These advantages did not result in a crop yield increase or decrease in the following potato crop. All three experiments demonstrate that cover crops can be incorporated into vegetable production systems on Iowa’s landscape to provide environmental benefit without negatively affecting yield.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".