MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2297478128 · doi:10.1117/12.2213080

High energy laser pulse coupling in a multimode fiber for photoacoustic tomography

2016· article· en· W2297478128 on OpenAlexafffund
Мин Ай, Weihang Shu, Septimiu E. Salcudean, Robert Rohling, Purang Abolmaesumi, Shuo Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMaterials scienceZemaxOpticsOptical fiberLaserMulti-mode optical fiberWavelengthCoupling (piping)Lens (geology)Subwavelength-diameter optical fibreCore (optical fiber)TomographyOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In traditional photoacoustic tomography, external illumination is used to excite acoustic waves. However, with the assistance of fibre-transmitted light, multidirectional illumination or internal illumination can be achieved which can obtain a better image at a deeper depth. Laser pulses delivered by fibre are energy-limited by the fibre core size and damage threshold. To increase the amplitude of photoacoustic waves and their penetration, it is necessary to improve the fibre coupling energy and efficiency. To improve the coupling performance of single fibres, we use a cylindrical lens array to homogenize the incident beam before a coupling lens. Simulation in Zemax shows that this approach flattens the beam profile on the front surface of the fibre, decreasing the risk of fibre damage. Experimental results with fibre core diameters of 1mm and 1.5mm show that both types of fibre can output more than 50mJ energy per pulse at 700nm wavelength. The coupling efficiency is measured to be above 70% and even reaches 90% as the wavelength changes from 675nm to 900nm. This improvement of coupling energy in single fibres will benefit photoacoustic tomography applications using internal illumination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207