MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2297584884

Voices and Images of Nunavimmiut Vol 5: Environment Part 1: Renewable Resources and Wildlife Protection ed. by Minnie Grey, Marianne A. Stenbaek, and: Voices and Images of Nunavimmiut Vol 6: Environment Part 2: Contaminants, Land Use and Climate Change ed. by Minnie Grey, Marianne A. Stenbaek (review)

2015· article· en· W2297584884 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ken Atkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Canadian Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporationQueen (butterfly)WildlifeHistoryDominionBayArcticMedia studiesLibrary scienceArchaeologyPolitical scienceSociologyLawOceanographyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Minnie Grey and Marianne A. Stenbaek (eds), Voices and Images of Nunavimmiut Vol 5: Environment Part 1: Renewable Resources and Wildlife Protection (Montreal and Kingston: IPI Press/McGill-Queen's University Press, 2013), 256 pp. Cased. $29.95. ISBN 978-0-9829155-4-7.Minnie Grey and Marianne A. Stenbaek (eds), Voices and Images of Nunavimmiut Vol 6: Environment Part 2: Contaminants, Land Use and Climate Change (Montreal and Kingston: IPI Press/McGill-Queen's University Press, 2013), 192 pp. Cased. $27.95. ISBN 978-0-9829155-5-4.It remains true that Yukon, North-west Territories and Nunavut continue to receive the bulk of writings about the Canadian Arctic; Nunavik (Quebec north of the 55° parallel) is a Cinderella in comparison. These are the latest two volumes in a series which restores the balance a little, and has previously covered: (1) Stories & Tales, (2) Way of Life, (3) Health, and (4) Children & Youth. They contain just over 100 short articles, averaging three to four pages each, which have been selected from 'pieces' published by the Makivik Corporation between 1975 and 2010 in its newsletters and magazines - Taqlarit, Atvaqnik and principally the Makivak Magazine. The Makivik Corporation was established under the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement ( JBNQA) of 1975. It is responsible for the administration of Inuit lands in Nunavik, and also for the use of compensation payments under JBNQA. 'Nunavimmiut' is Inuktitut for an inhabitant of Nunavik, and the content of both volumes focuses on how the Inuit still depend upon the environment. Readers unfamiliar with the geography of Nunavik are spared the chore of continually consulting an atlas with English and Inuktitut spelling of place-names, as both volumes contain an excellent map combining both scripts, and there is the bonus of a coloured map in English on the beautifully-designed dust covers. Each volume has a perceptive and scene-setting introduction; Volume 5 by Johnny Peters, Makivik Vice President of Renewable Resources, and Volume 6 by Sheila Watt-Cloutier of the Inuit Circumpolar Conference (ICC).Volume 5 contains two sections - 'Renewable Resources' and 'Protection of Wildlife' - which, almost inevitably, overlap at the margins in material covered. 'Renewable Resources' introduces an extremely wide range dealing with marine mammals and fish, but most material covers the James Bay agreement and general issues of renewable resource planning. The 'Protection of Wildlife' section concentrates more on particular species - beluga whales, bowhead whales, walrus, Arctic char, Canada geese, and musk oxen. An important theme for fish resources is enhancement of habitat, e.g. by engineering works on rivers, and release of eggs and fry. Discussions on whales, polar bear and musk-ox highlight the differences in view between Inuit harvests, and attempts by government and wildlife NGOs to impose quotas or ban the har vest altogether. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Canadian StudiesSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207