Bibliographic record
Abstract
MR Leo Ann Peng seems to have been a man with a very clear view as to how his family should live. He made a will in 1970 in which he left his eldest son $1 only. He left his only substantial property, a house at 42 Phillips Avenue, to be held on trust for his wife and his four other sons to reside therein free of rent, provided that each of the four sons paid a quarter of all the expenses. Clause 3 of the will directed that the property should not be sold unless and until unanimously agreed by the four sons, and in the event of sale, the proceeds should be distributed equally amongst the four sons. At the time he made the will Mr Leo, his wife and the four sons to whom the trust related lived at the property. One of these sons moved out of the house in 1980, well before the death of Mr Leo in 1989. The father, however, did not change his will despite the fact that the departure of one of his sons from the property clearly altered his original plans. The reasons for this are not known.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.042 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.028 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".