MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2298192900

Maternal and Perinatal Health of Refugees in Ontario: A Population-based Perspective

2015· dissertation· en· W2298192900 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susitha Wanigaratne

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)RefugeePopulationMedicineEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Refugee women and their newborns are suspected to experience greater risk of adverse maternal and perinatal health outcomes. However, little systematic refugee-specific research has been done. This dissertation poses the research question - "are refugee immigrant women and their newborns at higher risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes compared to 1) non-refugee immigrant and 2) non-immigrant women?" Large population-based immigration (1985-2010) and hospitalizations databases (2002-2010) from Ontario, Canada were used (all women eligible for health insurance). The first manuscript examined severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and SMM subtypes among refugee immigrants compared to both non-refugee immigrants and non-immigrants. The rate of any SMM was elevated among refugees (n=30,420) compared to non-refugee immigrants (n=235,540) (adjusted rate ratios (ARR)=1.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.36) and non-immigrants (n=878,709) (ARR=1.34 (1.23-1.47)). HIV (SMM subtype) among refugees was 8 and 17 times that of non-refugee immigrants and non-immigrants, respectively. The SMM rate among refugees was no longer elevated when deliveries with HIV were excluded. The second manuscript examined the risk of severe neonatal morbidity (SNM) among neonates born to refugees compared to those of non-refugee immigrants and non-immigrants. SNM risk among non-sponsored refugees (i.e., asylum seekers) was also compared to that of sponsored refugees (i.e., government, privately sponsored). The risk of severe neonatal morbidity was significantly higher among newborns of refugee compared to non-refugee immigrants (ARR=1.10 (1.03-1.17)) but lower in comparison to non-immigrants (ARR=0.94 (0.89-0.99)). There was no difference by sponsorship status. The objective of the third manuscript was to determine if the relationship between refugee status and risk of preterm birth (PTB) was modified by secondary (migration to another country prior to Canada) or primary (direct to Canada) migration. A secondary objective was to examine whether this relationship varied by maternal region of birth. Secondary refugees and primary refugees experienced a significantly higher cumulative probability of PTB (22-31, 32-36, ≥37 weeks) compared to their secondary and primary non-refugee counterparts (adjusted cumulative odds ratio (ACOR) =1.59 (1.25-2.01) and ACOR=1.12 (1.02-1.23)), respectively. These associations were also significant for Asian immigrants. This dissertation makes a substantial contribution towards understanding the health and the determinants of health of refugee immigrant mothers and their infants in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207