Book Review: Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Perspectives, by Nicholas Tsagourias (ed)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONSTITUTIONALISM presupposes a conceptual and theoretical shift of perspectives.This shift is related to the development of analytical tools that capture the tension between legality and legitimacy outside of state boundaries, which have constituted the traditional boundaries of legal discourse.The numerous processes of transnational constitutionalization present a particular challenge for those theories that too easily project learned, domestic notions of political power, law, and legitimacy onto conflict situations in the transnational arena.3 Nicholas Tsagourias's collection of essays, Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Perspectives, offers numerous perspectives on the myriad normative underpinnings, practical examples, and political contexts of transnational constitutionalism in Europe and abroad.The reader is left with the impressiori that the project of transnational constitutionalism is an aspirational, rather than descriptive, endeavour.As such, it aims to limit political power through law and create a global legal community.Tsagourias's theoretical roadmap underlines the constraints of this project, including the lack of 1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".